CoolTown

Make new friends, find a date, chat, mix with people that share your interests

Be a nice person and fear God........................ keeping his commandment is a good way to success in life.

Views: 0

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Avert your eyes brother. As a rule I'm also against girls sharing too much body info online, but let's face it, God gave her a beautiful pair of legs. So perhaps the commandment is simply to enjoy the beauty!

AbuHishaam SS said:
On second thought, I dont know how you expect us to obey God's commandments when you are helping us to break them by exposing your legs and body to everyone online.
This is were temptation steps in to test God's commandments,you can lower your gaze when sights of temptations presents itself,after all you as an individual is responsible to control your train of thoughts of situations that arises......if your thoughts are bad,then its your sin.
AbuHishaam SS said:
On second thought, I dont know how you expect us to obey God's commandments when you are helping us to break them by exposing your legs and body to everyone online.
"These women are looking for it if you ask me".......so!!!,it goes back to the drawing board that woman get raped because of the way they dress...!!!!
Then why do babies,toddlers both male and female,old ladies,adult male, parents raping their own children,why do they get raped??.....will the blame again go to the way they dress??


AbuHishaam SS said:
Yes she can. But should not. Why the hell should she want to make it difficult for us guys. I understand we get a lot of women who say and believe if a woman wants to show off a lot of style then she should dress in styles that show a lot. I say for her to preserve her booty and tooty for her hubby or boyfriend is the way to go. Wha is there to look forward to if she is on display. How many men are able to strip a woman with ther eyes? Yet how many have hearts that are governed by moral principles? If she wants to market herself by showing off her precious gems, then she should do so under relevant forums and circumstances, not with a Bible or Quran in her hand. If she wants to preach morality, then she should be an example to the people she is inviting to her moral teachings. Christ says, it is better to pluck your eye out than to let it look at a woman with lust. How long can weaklings like us handle exposed enticing sexy woman online? Once, twice, what about the third time. Will we have to fight the feeling when the woman keeps showing off her goodies? I should think not. This may not be my personal plight but we live in a sick world and rapists are on the prowl. These women are looking for it if you ask me.

TREVOR said:
Cant a woman show off a bit of her body without a man looking at her with hungry eyes?

AbuHishaam SS said:
On second thought, I dont know how you expect us to obey God's commandments when you are helping us to break them by exposing your legs and body to everyone online.
Another hijacked topic. I love it. This is how you do it folks!
Oh please!!! Get a life u sicko! The problem lies with the sick idiots out there that has nothing but S#*t on their brains.Y should we as woman hide our bodies because theres sick F#**ks that can't keep there minds clean out there? Y don't u ask ur president wot example he is setting? It all boils down to morality.Peoples values has gone down the gutter with their mindset.Maybe you should ask Rota-roota if they will c if they can find yours?

AbuHishaam SS said:
Yes she can. But should not. Why the hell should she want to make it difficult for us guys. I understand we get a lot of women who say and believe if a woman wants to show off a lot of style then she should dress in styles that show a lot. I say for her to preserve her booty and tooty for her hubby or boyfriend is the way to go. Wha is there to look forward to if she is on display. How many men are able to strip a woman with ther eyes? Yet how many have hearts that are governed by moral principles? If she wants to market herself by showing off her precious gems, then she should do so under relevant forums and circumstances, not with a Bible or Quran in her hand. If she wants to preach morality, then she should be an example to the people she is inviting to her moral teachings. Christ says, it is better to pluck your eye out than to let it look at a woman with lust. How long can weaklings like us handle exposed enticing sexy woman online? Once, twice, what about the third time. Will we have to fight the feeling when the woman keeps showing off her goodies? I should think not. This may not be my personal plight but we live in a sick world and rapists are on the prowl. These women are looking for it if you ask me.

TREVOR said:
Cant a woman show off a bit of her body without a man looking at her with hungry eyes?

AbuHishaam SS said:
On second thought, I dont know how you expect us to obey God's commandments when you are helping us to break them by exposing your legs and body to everyone online.
Ya, you can depend on Bodhidharma to confuse everybody with the facts. I was thinking: My ancestors walked around with a minute apron to protect the bare essentials. I don't have any concrete evidence, but can deduce that strip shows would not get you extra meat or mealies. Soliciting at the riverbank would also be ridiculous. So were we more moral when naked?

I have been on topless beaches and at least once to Sandy Bay. Nobody jumped each other's bones.

So there you guys have it, another dilemma.
Sweet guys. You are allowed to hug and kiss on the cheeks!

AbuHishaam SS said:
If you ask me, she is out on a rampage, starting discussions that she cannot finish. The next time i see her, would like to have a heart to heart discussion with her...and maybe even steal her heart in the process. Dont worry, I'll be nice to her and to others like I promised. Thanks for the invite into your world. See you around chum!

TREVOR said:
We as men,and women,have the power within to resist temptation.What we do with that power determines who we are and how others see us.Treat a woman like a delicate flower and her fragrance will be sweet smelling to the nostrils.She will bloom throughout your life for you.Remember,hell hath no fury like a womans scorn.Truce.

AbuHishaam SS said:
Clear and fair enough bro. Truce? I promise to be nice to the gals from now on. But just as they have their women's lib clubs, I thought I'd mobilize a Men's Club to overpower their flowerpower that drives a lot of innocent men up the wall. I don't have anything against women or you either. If we don't clash, we can never be true friends. You can remember that in our future arguments and difference of opinion.

TREVOR said:
As I said Abu,and if it offends you then you deal with it,but i will not stand around while someone belittles a woman.No,I'm not seeking anything in return! I just do not agree with the way you talk,and many others,about women.i believe I am a man .If I wasn't , I would watch and maybe even join in with the degrading of the ladies.You may not agree with the hitting of a woman but just remember that words can break a woman to pieces.So often,our words can do more damage than we can imagine.i don't hate you Abu.Hate is a very strong word with repercussions.I just do not condone your way of treating women. If you don't like my upfront attitude then build a bridge and get over it.We can still chat and discuss things I don't mind,as long as you know where you stand with me.

AbuHishaam SS said:
Come now Trevor...stop being like so maan. That's what we guys do here. Hijack discussions and drift a little and in the old end, we learn something from someone and even about ourselves and others. Coming back to your comment. How far is a Prophet from God and the Fear of God, the Medieval Age of Ignorance and the Modern Age to our topic that you find all these subtopics to be strange and deviant from our discussion? And by the way, where the hell is the lady who started this forum?

TREVOR said:
LMIMP!!From a topic of being a nice person and fearing God ,to the way women dress and ending up at prophets and the medieval age of ignorance. And who do we have to thank for this ?? Abu you are too much.Try running a bit faster.

AbuHishaam SS said:
You've done it again. Disappointing me and making me laugh at the same time. Anyway, the people in question were obviously barbarians following no particular heavenly guidance. History has it that no community in which a Prophet was sent had people who walked around in aprons protecting their bare essentials. If toward the medieval Age of Ignorance and Darkness is where you guys wish to see the world heading, I'm sure you will not run short of followers. I believe: "Dont let profanity lure, dazzle and impress you even if it be rift and flagrant!"

bodhidharma said:
Ya, you can depend on Bodhidharma to confuse everybody with the facts. I was thinking: My ancestors walked around with a minute apron to protect the bare essentials. I don't have any concrete evidence, but can deduce that strip shows would not get you extra meat or mealies. Soliciting at the riverbank would also be ridiculous. So were we more moral when naked?

I have been on topless beaches and at least once to Sandy Bay. Nobody jumped each other's bones.

So there you guys have it, another dilemma.
AbuHishaam,are you looking for me?....i was out of town for few days but i am back to defend the topic i hijacked,...as far as i am concerned irrespective of the faith a person follows the facts of whats right from wrong is COMMON SENSE,a person controls their own thinking and if their thoughts are unnatural thus leading to temptation...they are sinners as they are WEAK and cannot resist temptation.

AbuHishaam SS said:
Come now Trevor...stop being like so maan. That's what we guys do here. Hijack discussions and drift a little and in the old end, we learn something from someone and even about ourselves and others. Coming back to your comment. How far is a Prophet from God and the Fear of God, the Medieval Age of Ignorance and the Modern Age to our topic that you find all these subtopics to be strange and deviant from our discussion? And by the way, where the hell is the lady who started this forum?

TREVOR said:
LMIMP!!From a topic of being a nice person and fearing God ,to the way women dress and ending up at prophets and the medieval age of ignorance. And who do we have to thank for this ?? Abu you are too much.Try running a bit faster.

AbuHishaam SS said:
You've done it again. Disappointing me and making me laugh at the same time. Anyway, the people in question were obviously barbarians following no particular heavenly guidance. History has it that no community in which a Prophet was sent had people who walked around in aprons protecting their bare essentials. If toward the medieval Age of Ignorance and Darkness is where you guys wish to see the world heading, I'm sure you will not run short of followers. I believe: "Dont let profanity lure, dazzle and impress you even if it be rift and flagrant!"

bodhidharma said:
Ya, you can depend on Bodhidharma to confuse everybody with the facts. I was thinking: My ancestors walked around with a minute apron to protect the bare essentials. I don't have any concrete evidence, but can deduce that strip shows would not get you extra meat or mealies. Soliciting at the riverbank would also be ridiculous. So were we more moral when naked?

I have been on topless beaches and at least once to Sandy Bay. Nobody jumped each other's bones.

So there you guys have it, another dilemma.
We can change the way we dress and the company we keep,we can go the extra mile of exposing the rapist,how are we ever going to change the root of all evil that lies embedded in the minds of these rapist?
AbuHishaam SS said:
Not in the least, NYSA. Rape cases may not be the worst case senario for poorly dressed females. Like we said, eat what you like and dress what you like without having to be neither extravagant nor scanty. The middle course is best. We were talking about dressing for the occassion, not dressing in general. Thanks for callling to mind that rape usually happens among people who are close and who know each other.

NYSA said:
AbuHishaam,are you looking for me?....i was out of town for few days but i am back to defend the topic i hijacked,...as far as i am concerned irrespective of the faith a person follows the facts of whats right from wrong is COMMON SENSE,a person controls their own thinking and if their thoughts are unnatural thus leading to temptation...they are sinners as they are WEAK and cannot resist temptation.

AbuHishaam SS said:
Come now Trevor...stop being like so maan. That's what we guys do here. Hijack discussions and drift a little and in the old end, we learn something from someone and even about ourselves and others. Coming back to your comment. How far is a Prophet from God and the Fear of God, the Medieval Age of Ignorance and the Modern Age to our topic that you find all these subtopics to be strange and deviant from our discussion? And by the way, where the hell is the lady who started this forum?

TREVOR said:
LMIMP!!From a topic of being a nice person and fearing God ,to the way women dress and ending up at prophets and the medieval age of ignorance. And who do we have to thank for this ?? Abu you are too much.Try running a bit faster.

AbuHishaam SS said:
You've done it again. Disappointing me and making me laugh at the same time. Anyway, the people in question were obviously barbarians following no particular heavenly guidance. History has it that no community in which a Prophet was sent had people who walked around in aprons protecting their bare essentials. If toward the medieval Age of Ignorance and Darkness is where you guys wish to see the world heading, I'm sure you will not run short of followers. I believe: "Dont let profanity lure, dazzle and impress you even if it be rift and flagrant!"

bodhidharma said:
Ya, you can depend on Bodhidharma to confuse everybody with the facts. I was thinking: My ancestors walked around with a minute apron to protect the bare essentials. I don't have any concrete evidence, but can deduce that strip shows would not get you extra meat or mealies. Soliciting at the riverbank would also be ridiculous. So were we more moral when naked?

I have been on topless beaches and at least once to Sandy Bay. Nobody jumped each other's bones.

So there you guys have it, another dilemma.
You will have to avert your eyes or risk committing a sin.

AbuHishaam SS said:
Yeah NYSA, been secretly admiring and missing you. There, Now its in the open. How you been? Two things I die for. 1) What you must look like. 2) What makes you tick.
NYSA said:
AbuHishaam,are you looking for me?....i was out of town for few days but i am back to defend the topic i hijacked,...as far as i am concerned irrespective of the faith a person follows the facts of whats right from wrong is COMMON SENSE,a person controls their own thinking and if their thoughts are unnatural thus leading to temptation...they are sinners as they are WEAK and cannot resist temptation.

AbuHishaam SS said:
Come now Trevor...stop being like so maan. That's what we guys do here. Hijack discussions and drift a little and in the old end, we learn something from someone and even about ourselves and others. Coming back to your comment. How far is a Prophet from God and the Fear of God, the Medieval Age of Ignorance and the Modern Age to our topic that you find all these subtopics to be strange and deviant from our discussion? And by the way, where the hell is the lady who started this forum?

TREVOR said:
LMIMP!!From a topic of being a nice person and fearing God ,to the way women dress and ending up at prophets and the medieval age of ignorance. And who do we have to thank for this ?? Abu you are too much.Try running a bit faster.

AbuHishaam SS said:
You've done it again. Disappointing me and making me laugh at the same time. Anyway, the people in question were obviously barbarians following no particular heavenly guidance. History has it that no community in which a Prophet was sent had people who walked around in aprons protecting their bare essentials. If toward the medieval Age of Ignorance and Darkness is where you guys wish to see the world heading, I'm sure you will not run short of followers. I believe: "Dont let profanity lure, dazzle and impress you even if it be rift and flagrant!"

bodhidharma said:
Ya, you can depend on Bodhidharma to confuse everybody with the facts. I was thinking: My ancestors walked around with a minute apron to protect the bare essentials. I don't have any concrete evidence, but can deduce that strip shows would not get you extra meat or mealies. Soliciting at the riverbank would also be ridiculous. So were we more moral when naked?

I have been on topless beaches and at least once to Sandy Bay. Nobody jumped each other's bones.

So there you guys have it, another dilemma.
OK!!!!,i am doing well thanks,....lets leave number 1 and 2 a mystery...maybe with time you will add number 3!
bodhidharma said:
You will have to avert your eyes or risk committing a sin.

AbuHishaam SS said:
Yeah NYSA, been secretly admiring and missing you. There, Now its in the open. How you been? Two things I die for. 1) What you must look like. 2) What makes you tick.
NYSA said:
AbuHishaam,are you looking for me?....i was out of town for few days but i am back to defend the topic i hijacked,...as far as i am concerned irrespective of the faith a person follows the facts of whats right from wrong is COMMON SENSE,a person controls their own thinking and if their thoughts are unnatural thus leading to temptation...they are sinners as they are WEAK and cannot resist temptation.

AbuHishaam SS said:
Come now Trevor...stop being like so maan. That's what we guys do here. Hijack discussions and drift a little and in the old end, we learn something from someone and even about ourselves and others. Coming back to your comment. How far is a Prophet from God and the Fear of God, the Medieval Age of Ignorance and the Modern Age to our topic that you find all these subtopics to be strange and deviant from our discussion? And by the way, where the hell is the lady who started this forum?

TREVOR said:
LMIMP!!From a topic of being a nice person and fearing God ,to the way women dress and ending up at prophets and the medieval age of ignorance. And who do we have to thank for this ?? Abu you are too much.Try running a bit faster.

AbuHishaam SS said:
You've done it again. Disappointing me and making me laugh at the same time. Anyway, the people in question were obviously barbarians following no particular heavenly guidance. History has it that no community in which a Prophet was sent had people who walked around in aprons protecting their bare essentials. If toward the medieval Age of Ignorance and Darkness is where you guys wish to see the world heading, I'm sure you will not run short of followers. I believe: "Dont let profanity lure, dazzle and impress you even if it be rift and flagrant!"

bodhidharma said:
Ya, you can depend on Bodhidharma to confuse everybody with the facts. I was thinking: My ancestors walked around with a minute apron to protect the bare essentials. I don't have any concrete evidence, but can deduce that strip shows would not get you extra meat or mealies. Soliciting at the riverbank would also be ridiculous. So were we more moral when naked?

I have been on topless beaches and at least once to Sandy Bay. Nobody jumped each other's bones.

So there you guys have it, another dilemma.
Interesting take on the primitives and savages. The way I look at it, every group who had a thousand laws and prohibitions must have been a very sinful and barbaric lot. The Semites would be on top of the list with 613 laws, most of it about splitting hooves and braiding hair!

If you do not jump every naked woman you see, then why do you need a law to remind you or hide the woman from sight?

AbuHishaam SS said:
Bodhiharma, would you agree that there are some sins that are worthy of committing? Do you know of any? I know one or two.

bodhidharma said:
You will have to avert your eyes or risk committing a sin.

AbuHishaam SS said:
Yeah NYSA, been secretly admiring and missing you. There, Now its in the open. How you been? Two things I die for. 1) What you must look like. 2) What makes you tick.
NYSA said:
AbuHishaam,are you looking for me?....i was out of town for few days but i am back to defend the topic i hijacked,...as far as i am concerned irrespective of the faith a person follows the facts of whats right from wrong is COMMON SENSE,a person controls their own thinking and if their thoughts are unnatural thus leading to temptation...they are sinners as they are WEAK and cannot resist temptation.

AbuHishaam SS said:
Come now Trevor...stop being like so maan. That's what we guys do here. Hijack discussions and drift a little and in the old end, we learn something from someone and even about ourselves and others. Coming back to your comment. How far is a Prophet from God and the Fear of God, the Medieval Age of Ignorance and the Modern Age to our topic that you find all these subtopics to be strange and deviant from our discussion? And by the way, where the hell is the lady who started this forum?

TREVOR said:
LMIMP!!From a topic of being a nice person and fearing God ,to the way women dress and ending up at prophets and the medieval age of ignorance. And who do we have to thank for this ?? Abu you are too much.Try running a bit faster.

AbuHishaam SS said:
You've done it again. Disappointing me and making me laugh at the same time. Anyway, the people in question were obviously barbarians following no particular heavenly guidance. History has it that no community in which a Prophet was sent had people who walked around in aprons protecting their bare essentials. If toward the medieval Age of Ignorance and Darkness is where you guys wish to see the world heading, I'm sure you will not run short of followers. I believe: "Dont let profanity lure, dazzle and impress you even if it be rift and flagrant!"

bodhidharma said:
Ya, you can depend on Bodhidharma to confuse everybody with the facts. I was thinking: My ancestors walked around with a minute apron to protect the bare essentials. I don't have any concrete evidence, but can deduce that strip shows would not get you extra meat or mealies. Soliciting at the riverbank would also be ridiculous. So were we more moral when naked?

I have been on topless beaches and at least once to Sandy Bay. Nobody jumped each other's bones.

So there you guys have it, another dilemma.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2012   Created by Daniel Cimring.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service